List of published territories Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of$$$Albania$$$Algeria$$$Angola$$$Antigua and Barbuda$$$Argentina$$$Armenia$$$Aruba$$$Australia$$$Austria$$$Azerbaijan$$$Bahrain$$$Barbados$$$Belarus$$$Belgium$$$Bermuda$$$Bolivia$$$Bosnia and Herzegovina$$$Botswana$$$Brazil$$$Bulgaria$$$Cabo Verde$$$Cambodia$$$Cameroon, Republic of$$$Canada$$$Caribbean Netherlands$$$Cayman Islands$$$Chad$$$Chile$$$China, People's Republic of$$$Colombia$$$Congo, Democratic Republic of the$$$Congo, Republic of$$$Costa Rica$$$Croatia$$$Curaçao$$$Cyprus$$$Czech Republic$$$Denmark$$$Dominica , Commonwealth of$$$Dominican Republic$$$Ecuador$$$Egypt$$$El Salvador$$$Equatorial Guinea$$$Estonia$$$Fiji$$$Finland$$$France$$$Gabon$$$Georgia$$$Germany$$$Ghana$$$Gibraltar$$$Greece$$$Greenland$$$Guatemala$$$Guernsey, Channel Islands$$$Guyana$$$Honduras$$$Hong Kong$$$Hungary$$$Iceland$$$India$$$Indonesia$$$Iraq$$$Ireland$$$Isle of Man$$$Israel$$$Italy$$$Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire)$$$Jamaica$$$Japan$$$Jersey, Channel Islands$$$Jordan$$$Kazakhstan$$$Kenya$$$Korea, Republic of$$$Kosovo$$$Kuwait$$$Kyrgyzstan$$$Lao PDR$$$Latvia$$$Lebanon$$$Libya$$$Liechtenstein$$$Lithuania$$$Luxembourg$$$Macau$$$Macedonia$$$Madagascar$$$Malawi$$$Malaysia$$$Malta$$$Mauritius$$$Mexico$$$Moldova$$$Mongolia$$$Montenegro$$$Morocco$$$Mozambique$$$Myanmar$$$Namibia, Republic of$$$Netherlands$$$New Zealand$$$Nicaragua$$$Nigeria$$$Norway$$$Oman$$$Pakistan$$$Panama$$$Papua New Guinea$$$Paraguay$$$Peru$$$Philippines$$$Poland$$$Portugal$$$Puerto Rico$$$Qatar$$$Romania$$$Russian Federation$$$Rwanda$$$Saint Kitts and Nevis$$$Saint Lucia$$$Saudi Arabia$$$Senegal$$$Serbia$$$Singapore$$$Sint Maarten$$$Slovak Republic$$$Slovenia$$$South Africa$$$Spain$$$Sri Lanka$$$Swaziland$$$Sweden$$$Switzerland$$$Taiwan$$$Tajikistan$$$Tanzania$$$Thailand$$$Timor-Leste$$$Trinidad and Tobago$$$Tunisia$$$Turkey$$$Turkmenistan$$$Uganda$$$Ukraine$$$United Arab Emirates$$$United Kingdom$$$United States$$$Uruguay$$$Uzbekistan, Republic of$$$Venezuela$$$Vietnam$$$Zambia$$$Zimbabwe JDCN-ANSNYN$$$JDCN-89JRLJ$$$JDCN-9L9ER3$$$JDCN-89HREB$$$JDCN-89HRFR$$$JDCN-89HRGN$$$JDCN-89HRHB$$$JDCN-89HRHY$$$JDCN-89HRJM$$$JDCN-89HRKA$$$JDCN-89HRKX$$$JDCN-89HRLL$$$JDCN-89HRM9$$$JDCN-89HRMW$$$JDCN-89HRNK$$$JDCN-89HRP8$$$JDCN-89HRPV$$$JDCN-89HRQJ$$$JDCN-89HRR7$$$JDCN-89HRRU$$$JDCN-89HRSH$$$JDCN-89HRV5$$$JDCN-89HRT6$$$JDCN-89HRTT$$$JDCN-89HRUG$$$JDCN-8FWH76$$$JDCN-89HRVS$$$JDCN-89HRWF$$$JDCN-89HRYE$$$JDCN-89HRZ3$$$JDCN-89HRZQ$$$JDCN-89HS2D$$$JDCN-89HS32$$$JDCN-89HS3P$$$JDCN-89PKJ7$$$JDCN-89HTBS$$$JDCN-89HS5N$$$JDCN-89HS6B$$$JDCN-89HS6Y$$$JDCN-8V8FHF$$$JDCN-89HS7M$$$JDCN-89HS8A$$$JDCN-89HS8X$$$JDCN-89HS9L$$$JDCN-89HSA9$$$JDCN-89HSAW$$$JDCN-89HSBK$$$JDCN-89HSC8$$$JDCN-89HSCV$$$JDCN-89HSDJ$$$JDCN-89HSE7$$$JDCN-89HSEU$$$JDCN-89HSFH$$$JDCN-89HSG6$$$JDCN-89HSGT$$$JDCN-9LFTHK$$$JDCN-89HSHG$$$JDCN-89HRX4$$$JDCN-8UENHH$$$JDCN-89HSJ5$$$JDCN-89HSJS$$$JDCN-89HSKF$$$JDCN-8HLNAZ$$$JDCN-89HSL4$$$JDCN-89HSLR$$$JDCN-89HSME$$$JDCN-89HSN3$$$JDCN-89HSNQ$$$JDCN-89HSPD$$$JDCN-89HSQ2$$$JDCN-89HSQP$$$JDCN-89HSRC$$$JDCN-89HSRZ$$$JDCN-89HRXR$$$JDCN-89HSSN$$$JDCN-89HSTB$$$JDCN-89HSTY$$$JDCN-89HSUM$$$JDCN-AN9ENE$$$JDCN-89HSVA$$$JDCN-89HSVX$$$JDCN-8EGQEM$$$JDCN-89HSWL$$$JDCN-89HSX9$$$JDCN-89HSXW$$$JDCN-89HSYK$$$JDCN-89HSZ8$$$JDCN-89HSZV$$$JDCN-89HT2J$$$JDCN-89HT38$$$JDCN-89HT3V$$$JDCN-89HT4J$$$UKWE-8CEb2F$$$JDCN-89HT5U$$$JDCN-89HT6H$$$JDCN-89HT77$$$JDCN-89HT7U$$$JDCN-89HT8H$$$JDCN-89HT96$$$JDCN-8HLRL5$$$JDCN-89HT9T$$$JDCN-97XLRC$$$JDCN-89HTAG$$$JDCN-89HTB5$$$JDCN-89HTCF$$$JDCN-89HTD4$$$JDCN-89HTDR$$$JDCN-89HTEE$$$JDCN-89HTF3$$$JDCN-89HTFR$$$JDCN-89HTGE$$$JDCN-89HTH3$$$JDCN-89HTHQ$$$JDCN-89HTJD$$$JDCN-89HTK2$$$JDCN-89HTKP$$$JDCN-89HTLC$$$JDCN-89HTLZ$$$JDCN-89HTMN$$$JDCN-89HTNB$$$JDCN-89HTNY$$$JDCN-8UPFL5$$$JDCN-89HTVJ$$$JDCN-89HTW7$$$JDCN-89HTPM$$$JDCN-89HTQA$$$JDCN-89HTQX$$$JDCN-89HTRL$$$JDCN-8FWGMB$$$JDCN-89HTS9$$$JDCN-89HTSW$$$JDCN-89HTTK$$$UKWE-8CDMS7$$$JDCN-89HTUV$$$JDCN-89HTWU$$$JDCN-89HTXH$$$JDCN-89HTY6$$$JDCN-89HTZG$$$JDCN-89HU25$$$JDCN-89HU2S$$$JDCN-89HU3F$$$JDCN-8VDJC3$$$JDCN-89HU44$$$JDCN-8V8FQH$$$JDCN-89HU4R$$$JDCN-89HU5E$$$JDCN-89HU63$$$JDCN-89HU6Q$$$JDCN-89HU7D$$$JDCN-89HU82$$$JDCN-89HU8P$$$JDCN-89HU9C$$$JDCN-89HU9Z$$$JDCN-89HUAN$$$JDCN-89HUBB$$$JDCN-9LFTHP$$$JDCN-89HUBY Afghanistan$$$Barbuda$$$Herzegovina$$$Cape Verde$$$Republic of Cameroon$$$People's Republic of China$$$Peoples Republic of China$$$Democratic Republic of the Congo$$$DRC$$$Republic of Congo$$$Curacao$$$Commonwealth of Dominica$$$Channel Islands$$$Channel Islands$$$South Korea$$$Republic of Korea$$$Laos$$$Republic of Lebanon$$$The Netherlands$$$PNG$$$Russia$$$Nevis$$$St. Kitts and Nevis$$$St Kitts and Nevis$$$St. Lucia$$$St Lucia$$$St. Maarten$$$St Maarten$$$Slovakia$$$SA$$$Tobago$$$Republic of Turkey$$$UAE$$$Great Britain$$$UK$$$Britain$$$Whales$$$Northern Ireland$$$England$$$US$$$U.S.$$$U.S.A.$$$USA$$$Republic of Uruguay$$$Republic of Uzbekistan$$$Republic of Zambia

France Corporate - Group taxation

Choose a topic
France Map
Country
See full country list
Close topic

Tax consolidation regime

French corporations and their 95% owned domestic subsidiaries may elect to file one single tax return, thus allowing the offset of losses of one group corporation against the profits of a related corporation. CIT is then levied on the aggregate income after certain adjustments for intra-group provisions (e.g. debt waivers, dividend distributions) have been made.

When shares in a company that will be integrated into the group are acquired by a group company from individuals or legal entities that control this group, either directly or indirectly, a portion of the group's overall financial expense incurred by the members of the group is progressively added back to the group's taxable income on a straight-line basis over a nine-year period.

A French subsidiary can be included in a tax consolidated group even if its parent company is not located in France. However, at least 95% of the share capital of the foreign company must be held, directly or indirectly, by the French company that is head of the tax consolidated group. In addition, the foreign company must be subject to CIT, be located in the European Union or in a member state of the European Economic Area whose tax treaty with France includes a mutual administrative assistance clause to fight tax fraud and tax evasion, and hold 95% of the lower-tier subsidiary’s shares.

Amending Finance Bill for 2014 adds the opportunity for the companies subject to CIT to adopt horizontal tax consolidation. The creation of a horizontal tax consolidation between French companies’ subsidiaries of the same parent located in an EU member state, or Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein, and subject to a tax equivalent to CIT (‘non-resident parent entity’) is now permitted, allowing one of its subsidiaries (called ‘parent company’) to be solely liable for CIT. This regime applies, optionally, for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2015.

A PE of a foreign company subject to French CIT can be a member of a French tax consolidated group if the shares of the foreign company are held by other French companies, which are members of the consolidated group.

Provisions on the tax neutrality of intra-group transaction flows (e.g. dividends, amortisation, waivers of debts, interest, and capital gains/losses on the sales of shares) have been modified to treat tax consolidated groups with an intermediate foreign company the same as other tax consolidated groups. Dividends distributed within a tax consolidated group under the parent-subsidiary regime are exempt up to 99%, and the remaining 1% may not be neutralised.

Allocation of the tax charge within a tax consolidated group

In an important decision dated 12 March 2010 ('Wolseley Centers France'), the French Supreme Court disagreed with the French tax authorities by ruling that the tax charge of the group can be freely allocated between members of the consolidated tax group.

Following this decision, group companies are free to enter into a tax consolidation agreement stating the conditions for the allocation of the group tax charge or, where applicable, the tax savings arising from the group arrangement.

The Supreme Court concludes that since the terms of an agreement to allow a re-allocation taking into account the specific results of each of the group companies, the terms of this re-allocation cannot be regarded as an indirect subsidy. However, this allocation should neither undermine the corporate benefit of each group member nor the minority shareholders rights; otherwise, this will result in an abnormal act of management.

Underpriced sale of asset between two entities of a same tax consolidated group

In a decision dated 10 November 2010 ('Société Corbfi'), the French Supreme Court specified that an underpriced sale of an asset between two members of the same tax group must be neutralised at the group level only after the computation of the entities results on a standalone basis.

First, on a standalone basis, the seller has to add back the advantage given to the buyer (i.e. the difference between the fair market value and the amount paid) and the buyer adds back this advantage as if it was a dividend. Second, when reprocessing the different entities results, the advantage added back by the buyer has to be neutralised at the group level.

Participation exemption regime

French parent companies (i.e. companies incorporated in France and holding qualifying shares that represent at least 5% of the issued capital of subsidiaries, French or foreign) have the option of excluding 95% of the subsidiaries' net dividends from CIT (5% of charges and expenses must be added back to the parent company’s taxable results). The French parent-subsidiary regime extends to certain shares without voting rights. There is no formal commitment to have held the shares for at least two years, and companies can benefit from this regime from the acquisition date of the shares. However, the obligation remains to hold the shares over this two-year period. Certain shares of listed real estate companies are not eligible to the French parent-subsidiary regime.

The taxation of dividends received by a parent company from its subsidiary cannot be capped at the amount of the expenses actually incurred by the parent company. Thus, the tax liability will be equal to 5% of the dividends received, tax credits included.

The French parent-subsidiary regime is not applicable to dividends paid from entities located in an NCST.

In principle, the subsidiary’s shares must be kept by the parent company for at least two years in order to benefit from the participation exemption regime. However, some operations lead to a break of the two-year holding period. In that case, the exchanged shares are deemed withheld until the sale of the securities received in exchange.

The exchanged shares will be deemed kept for the application of the participation exemption regime only if the gain or loss is not taken into account in the result of that exchange. If the gain or loss is included in the result, the dividends received may not benefit from the participation exemption regime and will be taxed.

In addition to the above, the 2016 Act repealed the exclusion from the benefit of the parent-subsidiary regime for the dividends received on shares with no voting rights.

Accordingly, the parent-subsidiary regime applies to dividends received on shares with no voting rights, retroactive to 3 February 2016.

In case of tax consolidated group

There is a 99% exemption on dividends received by a member of a tax group from:

  • another member of the same group or
  • a company:
    • subject to a tax equivalent to French CIT in another member state, or in an EEA member state that has concluded an administrative assistance agreement with France to fight against tax fraud and tax evasion, and
    • that fulfils the conditions to participate in a French tax consolidated group if it is established in France (other than being subject to CIT in France).

All other qualifying dividends remain 95% exempt (e.g. dividends from French subsidiaries that are not part of a consolidated group, dividends received from a foreign subsidiary if the French parent is not a member of the French consolidated group).

Distribution followed by absorption or sale of subsidiary

The FTC prevents the possibility for a company to accumulate the exemption of dividends received from its subsidiaries (under the participation exemption regime or the tax consolidation regime) and the deduction of a loss in value resulting from the dividends' distribution due to previous distributions at the time of the securities exchange or sale of shares.

Transfer pricing

Light but annual transfer pricing documentation is to be provided within six months from CIT filing, reporting all intra-group flows in excess of EUR 100,000 and any change in the transfer pricing policy compared to the previous period.

Upon tax audit, companies whose gross assets exceed EUR 400 million, have a turnover that exceeds a specific threshold (EUR 152.4 million or EUR 76.2 million, depending on the activity of the company), or that are part of a group that meet those criteria, and assuming they have management accounts or consolidated accounts, have to provide the French tax administration with analytical and consolidated accounts.

Identically, rulings granted by foreign tax authorities have to be part of the transfer pricing documentation.

It is not possible to defer the collection of CIT reassessed when a mutual agreement procedure is launched.

Transfer pricing documentation

Large corporations located in France (i.e. with annual turnover or amount of gross assets in excess of EUR 400 million) are required to provide documentation containing general information regarding the relevant group of companies, including main activities, operational and legal structures of the related companies, functions performed and risks borne, main intangible assets, and group transfer pricing policy, amongst others.

Advanced pricing agreements (APAs)

APAs are available for taxpayers only on the basis of international agreements entered into in accordance with Article 25 of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Model Tax Convention. Currently, taxpayers are also allowed to enter into APAs with the French tax authorities on a unilateral basis. In practice, taxpayers are entitled to submit their transfer pricing policy to the French tax authorities. Agreement of the tax authorities to the APA precludes a later challenge as long as facts and circumstances described in the APA and actual ones are identical.

Light French transfer pricing annual reporting obligation

All French entities with turnover or gross assets on the balance sheet exceeding EUR 50 million, or with more than 50% direct or indirect shareholder or subsidiary interest meeting this threshold, are also subject to the light but annual French transfer pricing documentation requirements.

French companies subject to these transfer pricing obligations must file Form 2257 no later than six months after the deadline to file the annual CIT return with the tax authorities.

Form 2257 discloses general information related to the consolidated group (i.e. activities performed, group transfer pricing policy, country of location of intangibles, etc.). The form also includes specific information on the French entity (i.e. aggregated amounts of intercompany transactions exceeding EUR 100,000, main transfer pricing method used for each kind of transaction, etc.).

The 2016 Finance Act introduced two main changes:

  • Electronic filing of Form 2257.
  • If the relevant French entities are members of a French fiscal unity (consolidated group), Form 2257 must be filed by the head company of the French fiscal unity on behalf of the entire consolidated tax group.

The law on economic transparency adopted in November 2016 has decreased the threshold beyond which companies are subject to the light French transfer pricing annual reporting obligation from EUR 400 million to EUR 50 million.

This threshold has been reduced for fiscal years ended 31 December 2016 and onwards.

Country-by-country (CbC) reporting

To align with recommendations of the OECD and the G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Initiative (Action 13), France has introduced CbC reporting for multinational corporations, applicable to tax years beginning on or after 1 January 2016. The annual obligation requires multinational corporations to file with the French tax authorities anytime within the 12 months following their fiscal year-end a CbC report disclosing information regarding the name, activities, and profits of foreign entities in the same group.

Multinational corporations will therefore file their first CbC report sometime in 2017. As an example, for fiscal years opened on 1 January 2016, the filing must be made no later than 31 December 2017.

French entities are subject to the new CbC reporting requirement if they:

  • establish consolidated accounts
  • directly or indirectly hold or control one or several legal entities established abroad, or have foreign branches
  • generate annual consolidated group revenue of at least EUR 750 million, and
  • are not held by one or several legal entities established in France already subject to the French CbC reporting requirement, or by legal entities established abroad that are subject to similar CbC reporting requirements pursuant to foreign legislation.

The French government will publish a list of states or territories that have implemented a similar CbC reporting requirement, have concluded an automatic exchange of information agreement with France, and comply with this agreement.

An entity established in France is also subject to the French CbC reporting requirement when that French entity is held, directly or indirectly, by a legal entity established in a foreign state or territory that would have been subject to the CbC reporting requirement if established in France when:

  • the French entity is designated by the consolidated group to perform the CbC reporting obligation for that group, and the French tax authorities have been informed of that designation, or
  • the French entity is not able to demonstrate that any other entity of the group, either established in France or in a listed state or territory, has been designated to perform the CbC reporting for the group.

Failure to provide the French tax authorities with complete CbC reporting will result in a penalty of up to EUR 100,000.

Thin capitalisation

Under current rules, the tax deduction of interest paid by a French company to its foreign controlling shareholders is subject to the following three restrictions:

Interest rate limitation

Under the amended Article 212 of the FTC, tax deduction of interest paid to related parties is limited to the higher of (i) the average annual interest rate applied by credit institutions to companies for medium-term variable rate loans or (ii) the interest that the borrowing company could have obtained from independent banks under similar circumstances. This rate is 2.07% for financial years ending on 31 December 2016. Having passed this interest rate test, French indebted companies have to pass a second test: the debt ratio.

Debt ratio

That part of interest paid to related parties that is deductible under the rate limitation test is disqualified if it exceeds all of the three following limitations during the same financial year:

  • Interest relating to financing of any kind granted by related parties, within the limit of 1.5 times the net equity of the borrower.
  • 25% of adjusted net income before tax (‘résultat courant avant impôt’, defined as the operating income, increased by certain items).
  • Interest income received from related parties (i.e. there is no limitation on thin capitalisation grounds when the borrowing company is in a net lending position vis-a-vis related entities).

The portion of the interest that exceeds the three above limits is not deductible, except if it is lower than EUR 150,000.

Carryforward of excess interest

That part of the interest that is not deductible immediately by the borrowing company can be carried forward, without time limit, for relief in subsequent years, provided there is an excess capacity during such years. The amount in excess is, however, reduced by 5% each year, from the second financial year following the financial year in which the interest expense has been incurred.

Exceptions

The thin capitalisation rules do not apply to interest payable by banks and credit institutions, and also to certain specific situations, such as interest in connection with intra-group cash pools or with certain financial lease operations.

The thin capitalisation rules do not apply if the French indebted company can demonstrate that the debt-to-equity ratio of the worldwide group to whom it belongs exceeds its own debt-to-equity ratio.

Deductibility is also facilitated within a French tax consolidated group. The thin capitalisation rules apply to each company member of the group taken on a stand-alone basis. Any excess interest incurred by such company is, however, not carried forward by it. Instead, it is appropriated at the group level.

Extension of the thin capitalisation mechanism to loans granted by related parties

In the specific case where the repayment of a loan granted by a third party (including banks) is guaranteed by a related party or by a third party whose commitment is itself secured by a related one, then the proportion of interest that is payable on that part of the loan that is secured in this way is potentially subject to thin capitalisation rules.

The provisions will not apply where the loan:

  • takes the form of a bond issued by way of a public offering or under equivalent foreign regulations, although this excludes private placements
  • is guaranteed by a related party solely by way of a pledge of shares in the debtor, security over the debtor’s receivables, or shares in a company directly or indirectly owning the debtor so long as the holder of such shares and the debtor are members of the same tax group; as a result, this exception will not apply where a foreign company grants a pledge of shares in its French subsidiary to guarantee the bank loan granted to it
  • is obtained in the context of a refinancing to allow the debtor to complete the mandatory repayment of a pre-existing debt, which is required as a result of a direct or indirect takeover of the debtor (allowed up to the amount of the loan principal repaid and accrued interest to that date), or
  • has been obtained prior to 1 January 2011 in connection with an acquisition of securities or the refinancing of such acquisition debt.

Controlled foreign companies (CFCs)

The CFC rules provide that:

  • French corporations are required to include in their taxable income profits made by their more than 50% owned foreign subsidiaries and branches. The 50% holding is determined by direct and indirect control of shares and voting rights.
  • The minimum holding threshold has to be reduced to 5% if over 50% of the share capital of the foreign entity is indirectly held through French or foreign companies controlled by the French parent company. However, if the shares in the foreign entity are listed on a regulated market, the French tax authorities will have to demonstrate that the French parent company, together with other entities holding shares in such foreign entity, is acting in concert.
  • The CFC rules are only applicable if the foreign legal entity or PE in which the French company owns the requisite percentage of shares is in a country with a privileged tax regime. A privileged tax regime is defined by the FTC as a tax regime in which a foreign jurisdiction subjects taxable income of a foreign entity to at least 50% or lower of the income tax liability that would have been incurred in France, had the activity of the foreign entity been performed in France.
  • Profits of the foreign entity that fall under the CFC rules are no longer taxed separately. They are now aggregated with the other taxable profits of the French parent company. Consequently, any tax losses incurred by the French parent company may be offset against the foreign entity’s profits.
  • The French parent company can avoid the application of the CFC rules if it demonstrates that the foreign entity carries an effective trading or manufacturing activity, conducted from its country of establishment or registered office. Furthermore, the CFC rules, in principle, are not applicable with respect of foreign branches or subsidiaries located in another EU country. However, this exception is not applicable if the French tax authorities can demonstrate that the foreign entity located in another EU country constitutes an artificial arrangement, set up to circumvent French tax legislation. This concept is similar to the ‘abuse of law’ concept, although it does not have all the same characteristics.

Last Reviewed - 01 June 2017

Select country
Select country
      Advanced print
      Advance print
      Please login to see favourites territories in Advance print
      Login
      Signup
      Contact us

      Successful

      Thank you for contacting PwC.
      Contacts
      See full country list
      Favourites
      Login
      Signup